Compliance as a Service (CaaS)
From zero to audit-ready in 6 weeks. SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and 20+ other frameworks. All done for you.
For teams that need certification fast to close deals, raise, or scale — without hiring a compliance team.
- SOC 2
- HIPAA
- ISO 27001
- GDPR
- PCI DSS
- 20+ Other Frameworks
Trusted by 300+ companies
What is Compliance as a Service?
Compliance as a Service (CaaS) is a managed service where an external team implements and maintains regulatory frameworks like SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or GDPR on your behalf.
Instead of hiring a compliance officer or buying tools you don’t know how to use, you get a dedicated team, a roadmap, and guaranteed audit-readiness. Most teams take up to 3 months, we guarantee a 6 week deadline for SOC 2 and ISO 27001 readiness.
Get certified in 6 weeks. Fully managed. Guaranteed.
One team. One fixed price. One outcome: a certified, audit-ready company.
What's Included
- Dedicated project manager from kickoff to certification
- Complete framework implementation: SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, or PCI DSS
- Free Vulnerability Scanning (~1000 USD)
- Every policy, procedure, and control document, written for you
- Weekly progress calls and tracking via Notion
- 1:1 Security Awareness Training Session
- More than 150+ Controls Implementation
- Incident Response Plan and Support
- Internal Audit (~1500 USD)
- 100% Guaranteed Certification
Who this is For
You're a founder who needs to get certified — fast.
- A prospect, partner, or investor just asked for your SOC 2 report. You don't have one.
- You've never implemented a compliance framework. You don't want to learn one.
- You don't have a compliance team. Hiring one will take 6 months and cost 6 figures
- You want someone to tell you exactly what to do, then do most of it.
What you get: A dedicated PM, a 6-week roadmap, every policy and process built for you, and a guarantee you’ll pass audit.
→ Right plan: Achievement Plan
You already run compliance and need leverage.
- You already own one or more frameworks. Your team's resources are stretched thin.
- Evidence collection, policy reviews, and audit prep eat your week.
- You don't need someone to take over. You need expert backup that fits your tools and workflow.
- You want the flexibility without the hassle: — pick what you need, drop what you don't.
What you get: Ongoing compliance maintenance, audit support, policy upkeep, and an external expert on call. We plug into your program. We don’t replace it.
→ Right plan: Trust Assurance Plan
Compliance Without the Headache.
Schedule Your Free Assessment Today
Your Fast Track to Certification
- Kick-off Meeting 60 mins
- Compliance Implementation 4 weeks
- Internal Audit / Audit Readiness 2 weeks
- External Audit As per auditor
- Certification Ready → Compliance Achieved
Why Axipro?
Pricing Plans
Our Pricing Plan
Transparent pricing for every stage of your compliance journey.
Accelerator
DIY Starter: Start Your Compliance for Free
- 30- Days Access
Free
for 30 Days
Achievement
Done-For-You Compliance in 6 weeks, Guaranteed
- 6 Weeks
Startup Package
$4,000 All-in
Less than 50 employees
Growth Package
$5,500 All-in
More than 50 employees
Resources
Related Case Studies
Resources
Related Articles
Atlassian doesn’t ask Marketplace Partners to hold both SOC 2 and ISO 27001. It asks for one of them, a SOC 2 Type 2 report or an ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certificate, and only once you reach Gold or Platinum in the Marketplace Partner Program or go after the new Atlassian Enterprise Certified badge. What trips most partners up is timing. Atlassian reviews partner levels every July, your evidence has to exist before July 1, and you can’t rush a SOC 2 Type 2 report. Below you’ll find what each program requires, which standard to pick, how to scope the audit around your app, the controls auditors push hardest on, and a timeline that gets you certified before your next review. Why Atlassian Marketplace Partners Now Need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 For years, a Marketplace app’s security story was really Atlassian’s story. Customers trusted Jira and Confluence, and the apps came along for the ride. Enterprise buyers don’t see it that way anymore, and neither does Atlassian. Enterprise Procurement and Vendor Security Reviews of Marketplace Apps Enterprise security teams treat a Marketplace app like any other vendor. Signing off on Jira doesn’t mean signing off on the reporting or time-tracking app
Most companies pursuing ISO 27001 certification for the first time will spend between $10,000 and $50,000 in year one, and far less than half of that goes to the auditor. A 50-person SaaS company typically pays $10,000 to $22,000 in certification body fees alone, then doubles or triples that figure in implementation work, tooling, and internal hours before the Stage 2 audit even begins. The wide range exists because ISO 27001 certification cost is not a price tag; it is the sum of a dozen separate decisions: your scope, your security maturity, your certification body, and whether you build the ISMS yourself, hire a consultant, or run it through a compliance automation platform. This article breaks down every one of those costs, stage by stage and region by region, including the ones that never appear in vendor quotes. Startups under 50 employees can price the readiness work up front. Axipro’s Achievement Plan starts at $4,000 for companies of that size. That fee covers the implementation work, not the certification body’s audit, which is billed separately and is the other large line in your budget. The sections below show what each piece costs and where fixed-fee readiness fits. What Determines ISO
Every PHP installation that serves web requests has been open to unauthenticated remote code execution since 2004. On October 21, 2026, the PHP project shipped the fix, the NSA told organizations to take unpatchable systems offline, and four European governments pulled their own websites to patch. Your security team is handling the interpreter. This article is for the person who has to explain the response to an auditor. php2shell is a security incident, and it’s also a live test of the vulnerability management, asset inventory, incident response and vendor management controls you attested to in your last audit. Every framework Axipro works with has a specific expectation for what you do in the next 72 hours and what evidence you keep. Below is the mapping, framework by framework: the control reference, what you need to do, and the artifact that satisfies it. What php2shell Is, in One Minute Two flaws in PHP core, CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619, both rated 9.2 on CVSS v4.0, let an unauthenticated attacker run code on the server. The first is triggered through out-of-memory handling that interrupts PHP while request data is only partially initialized. The second exploits request-owned internal state that survives after its memory has
Your managed service provider will show up in your SOC 2 audit whether you plan for it or not. The moment an MSP administers your endpoints, identities, backups, or monitoring, those become your controls operated by someone else’s staff, and your auditor will test them as such. Outsourcing the work never outsources the accountability. That makes MSP selection one of the most consequential decisions a company takes before pursuing SOC 2 compliance or ISO 27001 certification. The right provider shortens your audit, hands over evidence on request, and operates controls you would otherwise have to build yourself. The wrong one turns every evidence request into a negotiation and every finding into a finger-pointing exercise. Here’s what to evaluate before you sign. Understanding the MSP’s Role in SOC 2 and ISO 27001 Compliance How MSPs Impact Your Compliance Posture An MSP typically touches more of your control environment than any other vendor. Access provisioning, patching, endpoint protection, backups, log monitoring, incident response: in a typical growth-stage setup, the provider operates most of the controls an auditor will test. In SOC 2 terms, the MSP is a significant vendor or subservice organization whose work directly affects your Trust Services Criteria. Under ISO
Gartner predicts that by 2028, 90% of enterprise software engineers will use AI code assistants, up from less than 14% in early 2024. SOC 2 and ISO 27001 change management controls were written before that shift, and both rest on an assumption that AI-generated code breaks outright: the person who approved a change wrote it, or at least fully understood it. Neither the AICPA nor ISO has published AI-specific change management requirements, so auditors apply the existing controls, SOC 2 CC8.1 and ISO 27001 Annex A 8.32, to commits no human authored. Most teams discover the mismatch mid-audit, when a sample pulls up a 2,000-line agent-generated pull request that was approved in four minutes. This guide maps AI code generation to both frameworks: what each one requires, the risks AI coding assistants introduce, the workflow that satisfies auditors, and the evidence they request when GitHub Copilot, Cursor, or Claude Code shows up in your SDLC. Why AI-Generated Code Breaks Traditional Change Management Change management controls assume a human bottleneck. AI removes it in three places at once. The Volume Problem: AI Commits at Machine Speed A single developer running an agentic coding tool can open more pull requests in a
Compliance software collects the evidence. A consultant builds the system that evidence is meant to prove. That’s the real difference in the ISO 27001 consultant vs software decision, and most teams only figure it out after they’ve bought one and realized they still need the other. Below, we compare what each route covers, where it breaks down, and what it costs you in time, money, and your team’s hours. Short version: software on its own works for a small group of companies. For most SaaS and tech scale-ups trying to get an enterprise deal over the line, consultant-led implementation on a compliance platform is the faster and safer path to a certificate. Quick Answer: Consultant, Software, or Both? Software-only works if you already have an in-house security lead who’s taken a company through ISO/IEC 27001 before and has the time to own the project. Consultant-only still makes sense if you run mostly on-premise or legacy systems that platforms barely integrate with. For everyone else, which means most cloud-native companies under a few hundred people, a hybrid works best: a platform to handle evidence and monitoring, and a consultant to build the management system and stand behind it in front of