Reach SOC 2 Compliance in 6 Weeks or Less.

/ Client Achievement: Peeklogic Attains ISO 27001 Certification Through Drata’s Automated Compliance Solution

Client Achievement: Peeklogic Attains ISO 27001 Certification Through Drata’s Automated Compliance Solution

Abeera Zainab
October 1, 2024

Peeklogic , a prominent SaaS solutions provider, achieved a significant milestone with the attainment of ISO 27001 certification, bolstered by seamless support from Drata, an innovative automated security and compliance solutions provider. This achievement marks a testament to Peeklogic’s commitment to robust data security and compliance standards. We’re excited to celebrate this milestone and look forward to continued success in their journey of growth and compliance.

Understanding ISO 27001: Safeguarding Information Security Introduction to ISO 27001

ISO 27001, a globally recognized benchmark in information security management by the International Standards Organization (ISO), provides a robust framework for establishing, implementing, and enhancing an Information Security Management System (ISMS). Also known as ISMS Certification or Cyber Security Certification, ISO 27001 ensures organizations safeguard valuable assets like financial data and intellectual property. Axipro offers comprehensive ISO 27001 services, demonstrating commitment to maintaining high information security standards and protecting sensitive data from cyber threats and unauthorized access.

Focus on Risk Management

Central to ISO 27001 is a concentrated emphasis on risk management and the adoption of a holistic security approach. Unlike certain other standards and frameworks, ISO 27001 does not mandate specific technical controls. Rather, it furnishes organizations with a structured framework and a checklist of controls to formulate and sustain a robust ISMS.

Path to ISO 27001 Certification

Becoming ISO 27001 certified necessitates a methodical examination of an organization’s information security risks, incorporating assessments of threats, vulnerabilities, and potential impacts. Organizations must then orchestrate the design and implementation of a cohesive and comprehensive suite of information security controls and risk mitigation measures.

Rigorous Certification Process and Compliance Maintenance

The journey towards ISO 27001 certification culminates in a rigorous auditing process conducted by a third-party entity. This meticulous evaluation assesses whether the organization has effectively implemented applicable best practices as outlined in the standard. Furthermore, certified organizations must undergo annual audits to ensure ongoing compliance and adherence to ISO 27001 standards.

Why does ISO 27001 certification matter?

At Axipro, we prioritize our customers’ security by offering solutions aimed at mitigating organizational risks. ISO 27001 certification exemplifies our dedication to this cause. While not legally mandated, certification serves as tangible proof that an organization’s security protocols meet exceptionally high standards. We firmly believe that upholding the utmost information security standards is paramount for both us and our clients.

ISO 27001 serves as a pivotal framework to attain and maintain these standards. Anchored on three fundamental principles—Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability—it empowers organizations to fortify their security strategies and implement robust policies and controls.

Confidentiality: Safeguarding Data Privacy

Confidentiality is a core principle of ISO 27001, emphasizing the importance of preserving data privacy. It mandates that sensitive information remains accessible only to authorized personnel, ensuring its security and preventing unauthorized access.

Integrity: Ensuring Data Accuracy and Trustworthiness

Integrity requires organizations to maintain the consistency, accuracy, and security of their data. By fostering trust and reliability, this principle ensures that information remains unaltered and reliable, maintaining the integrity of organizational data assets.

Availability: Sustaining Operational Continuity

Availability ensures that systems, applications, and data remain accessible to meet operational demands. This principle is essential for sustaining business continuity, ensuring that critical resources are available when needed, thereby supporting uninterrupted operations.

By adhering to ISO 27001’s principles and obtaining certification, organizations affirm their commitment to safeguarding sensitive information and fortifying their security posture.

Why Drata?

Peeklogic’s partnership with Drata underscores Drata’s position as a leader in automated security and compliance solutions. Their platform simplifies compliance through continuous monitoring and evidence gathering, ensuring companies are audit ready. Drata’s expertise guides organizations, consolidating activities and mapping controls across frameworks, streamlining workflows, and providing thorough documentation. This accelerates compliance, saving time and ensuring consistent security standards.

Moreover, Drata’s continuous control monitoring and Security Reports bolster transparency and efficiency. They enable swift responses to due diligence requests, enhancing overall operational effectiveness. In essence, Drata offers not just streamlined processes and enhanced efficiency but also increased transparency, ensuring Peeklogic and other organizations maintain robust security and compliance standards.

How Drata empowers Peeklogic through this collaboration

Automated Assessment: Drata’s sophisticated algorithms continually assess Peeklogic’s security posture, leveraging advanced techniques to identify vulnerabilities swiftly. Through automated assessments, Drata provides actionable insights, enabling Peeklogic to address security issues promptly and effectively.
Real-Time Monitoring: With Drata’s real-time monitoring capabilities, Peeklogic gains unparalleled visibility into its security environment. By continuously monitoring for threats and anomalies, Drata empowers Peeklogic to proactively detect and respond to potential security incidents, enhancing overall security resilience.
Policy Management:Drata simplifies the complex process of policy management for Peeklogic. By providing tools for policy creation, enforcement, and documentation, Drata ensures that Peeklogic’s security policies align with ISO 27001 requirements and industry best practices. This streamlined approach enables Peeklogic to maintain robust security standards with ease.
Evidence Collection: Gathering evidence for compliance audits can be a time-consuming and labor-intensive task. Drata addresses this challenge by automating evidence collection processes for Peeklogic. By streamlining the audit preparation process, Drata reduces administrative burdens and enables Peeklogic to demonstrate compliance efficiently during audits.

Peeklogic & Drata: A Powerful Partnership

Axipro’s dedication to Simplify Compliance for customers shines through as they successfully onboard the Peeklogic team onto the Drata Platform. By facilitating this partnership, they demonstrate an unwavering commitment to streamlining the compliance journey, providing optimal solutions to expedite progress.

“We are thrilled to facilitate partnership of Peeklogic with Drata for ISO 27001 by our side,” Principal Consultant Ali Hayat expresses excitement about Peeklogic’s collaboration with Drata for ISO 27001, emphasizing Axipro’s pivotal role in the process.

With data security as a non-negotiable priority, Axipro relies on Drata’s innovative platform to equip them with the necessary tools and insights for efficiently achieving and maintaining ISO 27001 certification.

Looking Ahead: Leading the Path to Security Excellence

As Peeklogic embarks on its ISO 27001 compliance journey with Drata by its side, the company remains resolute in its commitment to excellence, innovation, and data security. By embracing industry-leading practices and harnessing cutting-edge technology, Peeklogic sets a precedent for others to follow in the ongoing pursuit of robust information security and regulatory compliance.

Streamline Your Compliance Journey with Axipro and Drata

Are you looking to enhance your data security efforts and expedite your compliance journey? Look no further! Axipro, a renowned Managed Security Service Provider (MSSP), proudly announces its partnership with Drata. Clients onboarded through this collaboration can avail an exclusive discount of 15-20% on services, ensuring streamlined compliance processes and enhanced security measures. Reach out for further information:

🌐 Website: https://axipro.co/

📧 Email: info@axipro.co

📱 Phone: +973 32209587

Axipro Author

Abeera Zainab

October 1, 2024
All Blog, ISO-27001

Blog Highlights

Explore More Articles

Achievement Plan, Customer Stories, ISO-27001

July 14, 2026

How Axipro Took Insightplay From a Compromised Audit to a Flawless ISO 27001

How Axipro Guided Technovative Solutions & DigiProd Pass to ISO 27001

AI Security

July 13, 2026

Secure AI Agent Vendor Certifications: 2026 Buyer’s Guide

An AI agent that can read your inbox, query your CRM, and dig through internal documents has more standing access than most of your employees. It handles sensitive data, acts on its own, and often passes that data through sub-processors you’ll never see. Certifications are the quickest way to tell which vendors have let an outsider check their work, and which ones just put the word “secure” on a landing page. No single certificate proves an AI agent is safe. But the right mix of security attestations, privacy certifications, and AI governance standards tells you the vendor has real controls, that an independent auditor has tested them, and that someone is on the hook when the agent misbehaves. This guide covers which certifications to ask for, how to verify them, and which claims should make you walk away. The Core Certifications Every Secure AI Agent Vendor Should Hold SOC 2 Type II SOC 2 Type II is the baseline for any SaaS or AI vendor that handles customer data. A licensed CPA firm audits the vendor against the AICPA’s Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy) and reports on whether its controls actually worked over a review period, usually 3 to 12 months. A Type I report only confirms the controls existed on one particular day. For an AI agent vendor, insist on Type II. Anything less tells you nothing about how the company runs day-to-day. ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC 27001 certifies that the vendor runs a formal information security management system (ISMS): documented risk assessments, defined controls, internal audits, and management review, all verified by an accredited certification body. It’s the most widely recognized security certification outside the US and often a hard procurement requirement in Europe, the UK, and the Gulf. A vendor with international customers should hold it alongside SOC 2, not instead of it. ISO/IEC 27701 (Privacy Information Management) ISO/IEC 27701 extends ISO 27001 with a privacy information management system (PIMS). It maps closely to GDPR concepts like controller and processor obligations, consent, and data subject rights. Almost every AI agent processes personal data at scale, and ISO 27701 is a decent signal that the vendor has built privacy into how it operates instead of delegating it to a policy PDF. ISO/IEC 42001 (AI Management Systems) ISO/IEC 42001 is the first certifiable international standard for AI governance. According to the International Organization for Standardization, it sets out requirements for building and maintaining an AI management system (AIMS): AI risk management, AI system impact assessments, lifecycle management, and oversight of third-party suppliers. For an AI agent vendor, this is the one that covers what SOC 2 and ISO 27001 don’t: how the vendor governs model behavior, training data, and the wider impact of autonomous systems. Worth Knowing: ISO 42001 certificates only started appearing in volume in 2024, and the accreditation ecosystem is still catching up. Check that the certificate came from a certification body accredited for ISO 42001 specifically (under ANAB or UKAS, for example), not just one accredited for ISO 27001. HIPAA (for Healthcare AI Agents) If the agent touches protected health information (PHI), the vendor has to comply with the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules and sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA). There’s no official HIPAA certification, so vendors prove compliance through third-party assessments, a SOC 2 with HIPAA mapping, or HITRUST CSF certification. A vendor that won’t sign a BAA has disqualified itself for healthcare work. PCI DSS (for Payment-Handling AI Agents) AI agents that process, store, or transmit cardholder data (think agents automating billing, refunds, or checkout) fall under PCI DSS. Ask for the vendor’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC) and check whether a Qualified Security Assessor validated it or the vendor assessed itself. The current version is PCI DSS 4.x, so an AOC that still references 3.2.1 is out of date. FedRAMP (for Government-Facing AI Agents) FedRAMP authorization is mandatory for cloud services sold to US federal agencies. Authorizations come at Low, Moderate, and High impact levels, and every authorized service appears on the public FedRAMP Marketplace. If a vendor claims FedRAMP status and isn’t in the Marketplace, either the claim is false or the service is still “in process,” and those are very different things. State and local buyers should look for StateRAMP instead. Worth Knowing: ISO 42001 Certificates ISO 42001 certificates only started appearing in volume in 2024, and the accreditation ecosystem is still catching up. Check that the certificate came from a certification body accredited for ISO 42001 specifically (under ANAB or UKAS, for example), not just one accredited for ISO 27001. HIPAA (for Healthcare AI Agents) If the agent touches protected health information (PHI), the vendor has to comply with the HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules and sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA). There’s no official HIPAA certification, so vendors prove compliance through third-party assessments, a SOC 2 with HIPAA mapping, or HITRUST CSF certification. A vendor that won’t sign a BAA has disqualified itself for healthcare work. PCI DSS (for Payment-Handling AI Agents) AI agents that process, store, or transmit cardholder data (think agents automating billing, refunds, or checkout) fall under PCI DSS. Ask for the vendor’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC) and check whether a Qualified Security Assessor validated it or the vendor assessed itself. The current version is PCI DSS 4.x, so an AOC that still references 3.2.1 is out of date. FedRAMP (for Government-Facing AI Agents) FedRAMP authorization is mandatory for cloud services sold to US federal agencies. Authorizations come at Low, Moderate, and High impact levels, and every authorized service appears on the public FedRAMP Marketplace. If a vendor claims FedRAMP status and isn’t in the Marketplace, either the claim is false or the service is still “in process,” and those are very different things. State and local buyers should look for StateRAMP instead. Regulatory Frameworks AI Agent Vendors Must Comply With Certifications are voluntary. Regulations aren’t. A credible AI agent vendor should be able to explain, in writing, how it meets

July 10, 2026

Shadow AI Policy Template: Ready-to-Use IT Framework

One in five organizations has already suffered a breach traced back to shadow AI. Meanwhile, 63% of breached organizations either have no AI governance policy at all or are still drafting one. Below is a complete, copy-ready shadow AI policy template with twelve sections, plus guidance on adapting it for your company size, your industry, and the regulatory frameworks you answer to. The template assumes one hard truth up front: your employees are already using unapproved AI tools. A policy that pretends adoption hasn’t started yet fails on day one, so this one starts from the assumption that it has. What Is a Shadow AI Policy? A shadow AI policy is a formal document that defines how your organization discovers, evaluates, approves, and governs AI tools that employees adopt outside official IT channels. The term borrows from shadow IT, the older problem of unsanctioned software and hardware, but the AI version carries sharper risks: data pasted into a public model may be retained, used for training, or exposed in ways the organization can’t reverse. The policy does three jobs: it separates approved use from unapproved use, gives employees a fast and visible way to request new tools so the sanctioned route beats the workaround, and spells out what happens when someone crosses the line, including how the organization detects it and responds. Shadow AI Policy vs. General AI Acceptable Use Policy Many organizations already have an AI acceptable use policy (AUP) and assume it covers shadow AI. It usually doesn’t. An AUP tells employees how to behave inside approved tools. A shadow AI policy governs the tools themselves: which ones exist in your environment, which ones are allowed, and what happens with the rest. You need both. The AUP handles conduct; the shadow AI policy handles inventory and control. If you only have room for one document, fold the AUP’s data-handling rules into Section 6 of the template below. The Shadow AI Policy Template (Download Link and Copy-Ready Sections) We’ve created a compliance safe template for Shadow AI Policy, use the link below to create a copy and customize for your company: Download The Shadow AI Policy Template → Copy the sections below into your policy management system and replace the bracketed placeholders. The language is plain on purpose. Legalese gets skimmed. Section 1: Purpose and Scope This policy governs the acquisition, approval, and use of artificial intelligence tools, features, and services at [Company]. It applies to all employees, contractors, interns, and third parties with access to [Company] systems or data. It covers standalone AI applications, AI features embedded in existing software, browser extensions, AI agents, APIs, and personal AI accounts used for work purposes, on both corporate and personal devices. The purpose of this policy is to enable productive AI use while protecting [Company] data, customers, and legal obligations. This policy does not prohibit AI. It prohibits ungoverned AI. That last sentence matters. Employees read the purpose statement first, and it decides whether they see the policy as an enabler or a blocker. Section 2: Definitions and Terminology Shadow AI: any AI tool, feature, agent, or service used for work purposes without formal approval under this policy. Approved AI Tool: an AI tool listed in the Approved AI Tools Registry (Section 4) and used under a [Company]-managed account. Personal AI Account: an account on any AI service registered to a personal email address or paid for personally. AI Feature: AI functionality embedded within otherwise approved software (e.g., an AI assistant added to a project management tool), which requires separate evaluation. Sensitive Data: data classified as [Confidential] or [Restricted] under [Company]‘s data classification policy, including the prohibited data classes in Section 6. Define “AI feature” explicitly. Vendors now ship AI additions into already-approved SaaS products every month, and without this definition, those features inherit approval they never earned. Section 3: Roles and Responsibilities The CISO (or designated security lead) owns this policy, maintains the Approved AI Tools Registry, and runs the approval workflow. Department heads ensure their teams know the policy and surface tool requests rather than suppressing them. Legal and Compliance review tools that touch regulated data or fall under the EU AI Act, GDPR, HIPAA, or client contractual restrictions. IT operates detection and monitoring controls (Section 9). Every employee is responsible for using only approved tools for work, reporting unapproved AI use they discover, and requesting new tools through the workflow in Section 7 rather than adopting them directly. Insider Note: In organizations under roughly 200 people, the “CISO” in this section is often the same overworked IT lead who manages laptops. Name a real person, not a title that doesn’t exist yet. A policy that assigns duties to a phantom role is unenforceable, and auditors notice. Section 4: Approved AI Tools Registry [Company] maintains a registry of approved AI tools at [location/URL]. For each tool, the registry records: tool name and vendor, approved use cases, prohibited use cases, permitted data classes, account type (enterprise/team/individual), data retention and training settings, risk tier (Section 5), approval date, and next review date. Only tools listed in the registry may be used for work. Tools not listed are unapproved by default. The registry is reviewed [quarterly]. Keep the registry somewhere employees actually look, such as your intranet homepage or IT help center, not buried in a GRC platform they can’t access. An invisible registry recreates the problem the policy exists to fix. Section 5: Risk Tier Classification (Low, Medium, High) Each tool in the registry is assigned a risk tier. Low: the tool processes only public or internal non-sensitive data, runs under an enterprise agreement with training opt-out, and produces output that a human reviews before use. Approval by IT Security alone. Medium: the tool processes internal business data or connects to [Company] systems via API or integration. Approval by IT Security plus the data owner. High: the tool processes sensitive data, customer personal data, or regulated data; makes or influences consequential decisions (hiring, credit, medical, legal); or operates autonomously

Table of Contents