Table of Contents

Reach SOC 2 Compliance in 6 Weeks or Less.

  /

  / How Much Does Vanta Cost? Plans & Real Costs

How Much Does Vanta Cost? Plans & Real Costs

Vanta does not publish a single price on its website. Every quote is custom, generated after a sales call, and shaped by four variables: your headcount, the number of frameworks you need, the add-ons you select, and how long you commit. The median Vanta contract sits around $20,000 per year based on aggregated procurement-platform data, with the full range running from about $10,000 for a lean startup to $80,000 and beyond for a multi-framework enterprise. There is also one cost that most analyses miss: the actual audit fee, which is not included in the Vanta subscription price. This breakdown covers every tier, every hidden line item, and the levers that actually move the number down.

How Much Does Vanta Cost

Vanta Pricing at a Glance

Vanta sells five named tiers, each aligned to a company stage or GRC maturity level. The figures below come from customer-reported benchmarks aggregated by procurement and price-intelligence platforms such as Vendr and PriceLevel, since no list prices exist publicly. Treat them as ranges, not quotes. The audit, paid to an independent firm, sits on top of all of these and typically adds $10,000 to $50,000 depending on framework and scope.

PlanTypical Annual Cost

Best For

Core~$10,000Startups, single framework
Plus$15,000–$30,000Growing teams needing access reviews and questionnaire automation
Growth$25,000–$50,000Scaling companies running multiple frameworks
Scale$50,000–$80,000Formalised GRC or security teams
Enterprise$80,000+Multi-entity, IPO-level, or highly complex environments

Reach SOC 2 Compliance in 6 Weeks or Less

Get 20% to 30% Off Vanta Through Our Partner Discount

Vanta Pricing Plans Explained

Core Plan: Entry-Level Compliance for Startups

Core is the entry point, generally landing around $10,000 per year, with reported deals clustering between roughly $7,500 and $14,000. It covers one framework, usually SOC 2 or ISO 27001, with automated evidence collection, ready-made policy templates, basic integrations, a public-facing Trust Center, and access to Vanta’s network of approved audit firms. Smaller teams pursuing a single framework land at the low end of that range. It is built for the first-time compliance journey, not for running compliance as an ongoing operational function.

Plus Plan: Advanced Features for Growing Teams

Plus typically runs $15,000 to $30,000 per year. It adds the capabilities Core leaves out: automated access reviews, approval workflows, and a capped allowance of automated security-questionnaire responses, commonly cited at 25 per year. That questionnaire cap is the detail that catches growing teams off guard, and it is covered in the hidden-fees section below.

Growth Plan: Built for Scaling GRC Programs

Growth, sometimes sold as the Professional tier, ranges from roughly $25,000 to $50,000 per year and is Vanta’s most commonly sold plan for scaling companies. It supports multiple frameworks, advanced integrations, customisable risk-management workflows, custom monitoring tests for non-standard controls, automated access reviews, advanced reporting, and a far larger questionnaire allotment, often cited at 144 per year. This is the tier for organisations treating compliance as a service and a real business function, rather than a one-time checkbox.

Scale Plan: Expanded Compliance Coverage

Scale pricing starts where Growth tops out and can reach up to $80,000 per year. It is aimed at companies with formalised GRC or security teams, many connected assets, and several frameworks running in parallel. SCIM-based user provisioning and deeper automation across onboarding and offboarding tend to appear at this level.

Enterprise Plan: Fully Custom Pricing

Enterprise is entirely bespoke, starting above $80,000 and quoted case by case. It bundles a dedicated customer success manager, priority support, custom integrations, and tailored implementation. It becomes relevant for organisations managing multiple legal entities, thousands of assets, strict SLA requirements, or IPO-level scrutiny.

Insider note: Vanta’s plan names shift over time and between sales reps. You will see Core called Essentials, and Growth called Professional, in different quotes and on different comparison sites. Anchor your evaluation to what the plan actually includes, frameworks supported, questionnaire allowance, access review automation, rather than the label on the proposal, because the label is the least stable thing about it.

How Much Does Vanta Cost Per Year?

Annual Cost by Company Size and Stage

For a startup under 50 employees chasing a single framework, expect roughly $10,000 to $12,000 per year. Most growing companies pay between $25,000 and $55,000. Larger organisations running multiple frameworks commonly land between $50,000 and $110,000 or more once add-ons and headcount are factored in. The median across all reported deals stays near $20,000, which tells you most buyers sit in the Core-to-Growth band rather than at the extremes.

How Pricing Scales With Company Size and Complexity

Vanta prices primarily on employee count and framework count. Add an employee bracket, and the per-seat-driven base creeps up. Add a framework, and you pay again for the incremental coverage. Complexity compounds this: more cloud accounts, more vendors to assess, and more integrations all push you toward higher tiers and more add-ons. Two companies of identical headcount can pay very different amounts purely on framework count and the modules they bolt on.

How to Negotiate Vanta Pricing

Buy Through a Certified Partner

Certified partners can frequently pass through discounts of 20 to 40 percent off list on multi-year contracts, alongside faster onboarding and implementation support. As a certified Vanta partner, Axipro secures clients 25% off Vanta pricing, and that discount applies on top of the platform’s standard multi-year terms rather than instead of them. The saving is only part of the value. Axipro folds the licence into a consultant-led compliance program, so you get the negotiated rate plus hands-on implementation, framework scoping, and audit preparation, rather than a cheaper login and a blank dashboard. For a team weighing a $25,000 quote, a quarter off the platform cost covers a meaningful slice of the audit fee that Vanta’s subscription never includes.

Negotiate Multi-Year Discounts

A two or three-year commitment is the most reliable discount lever. Vanta will trade a lower annual rate for a longer term and committed future growth. If you expect to add headcount or frameworks, name that expansion in the negotiation and use it to pull the rate down now.

Bundle Frameworks You’ll Need Later

If ISO 27001 or HIPAA is on your roadmap, negotiate for them in the initial deal rather than adding them piecemeal later. Per-framework add-ons bought mid-contract rarely come with the leverage you have during a fresh negotiation.

Time Your Negotiation Around Quarter-End

Sales teams carry quotas, and quotas reset on a calendar. Quarter-end and especially year-end create real pressure to close, which translates into flexibility on price. Time your final conversation accordingly rather than signing whenever the trial of patience runs out.

Defer Add-Ons Until You Truly Need Them

Do not buy Vendor Risk Management or expanded modules on day one because the demo made them look essential. Start with the framework you need to close deals, prove the program, and add modules only when a concrete business requirement appears. Deferred add-ons are deferred cost, and many never become necessary.

Is Vanta Worth the Cost?

Reported ROI and Time Savings

The case for any compliance automation platform rests on time reclaimed, not just certification achieved. Manual evidence collection, control monitoring, and questionnaire responses consume engineering and leadership hours that automation takes back. Customers across the category routinely report saving the equivalent of dozens of hours per month and compressing audit-readiness timelines from quarters into weeks. According to a Forrester Total Economic Impact study commissioned by Vanta, customers reported significant reductions in time spent on compliance activities and faster enterprise sales cycles as a direct result of having a completed SOC 2 report. Faster readiness means faster deals: a completed report can shorten enterprise procurement cycles meaningfully.

Cost Considerations for Startups vs. Enterprise

For a startup, the question is rarely whether to automate but whether the premium tier is justified. A lean team chasing one framework gets most of the value from the entry tier paired with a good auditor. For an enterprise, the calculus flips: the platform cost is small relative to the headcount it saves and the deal velocity it unlocks, and the premium support and multi-framework mapping start to pay for themselves.

What Real Customers Say About Vanta Pricing

Sentiment is broadly positive on the product and more mixed on the commercials. Buyers on review platforms such as G2 and Gartner Peer Insights praise the integration depth, the polished interface, and the auditor experience. The recurring complaints are predictable: opaque quoting, add-ons that inflate the base, and renewal increases. The median reported contract near $20,000 suggests most buyers find the value defensible, but few describe the pricing process as transparent.

Reach SOC 2 Compliance in 6 Weeks or Less

Get 20% to 30% Off Vanta Through Our Partner Discount

Does Vanta Have a Free Plan or Free Trial?

No. Vanta offers neither a permanent free plan nor a public self-serve free trial. Every engagement starts with a demo and a custom-quoted proposal built around your company size, frameworks, and needs. The closest thing to a trial is a guided demo environment arranged through sales. Budget for a paid annual commitment from day one, because that is the only way in.

 

Additional Costs Beyond the Base Subscription

Audit Fees Not Included in Vanta Pricing

This is the single biggest budgeting trap. Vanta’s subscription buys the automation platform, not the certification. The actual audit is performed by an independent CPA firm (for SOC 2) or an accredited certification body (for ISO 27001), and it is billed separately. A SOC 2 Type 1 audit commonly runs $5,000 to $20,000, while a Type 2 report runs $8,000 to $50,000 or more, often quoted around $12,000 to $15,000 for a standard scope. The SOC 2 standard is maintained by the AICPA.

Per-Framework Pricing

Vanta charges per framework. Industry insiders peg each additional framework at roughly $5,000 on top of your base, though the figure scales with company size. A company that starts with SOC 2 and later layers on ISO 27001 and HIPAA is effectively buying three coverage lines, not one. This is why a Core plan quoted at $10,000 can quietly become a $30,000 bill once a second and third framework are added.

Add-On Modules and Features

Several capabilities that buyers assume are core turn out to be paid modules. Customer-reported figures put the Trust Center at around $6,000 per year and Vendor Risk Management at around $11,200 per year. Risk assessment, advanced reporting, and custom monitoring can also sit behind higher tiers or separate line items. Each one is individually reasonable, collectively they reshape the total.

Premium Support and Platform Channels

Standard tiers come with standard support, which in practice means community resources and slower response times. Priority support, a dedicated customer success manager, and direct platform channels generally appear only at Scale and Enterprise. If hands-on guidance matters to a lean team, that need can push you a full tier higher than the feature set alone would justify.

Important: When you compare Vanta quotes against a SOC 2 budget, separate the platform line from the audit line. An all-in first-year SOC 2 program, platform, readiness work, and the CPA audit commonly totals $45,000 to $70,000 for a startup, and more for mid-market environments. The platform subscription is often the smallest of the three numbers, so judging Vanta on that figure alone understates what compliance actually costs.

Vanta vs Top Competitors

Hidden Fees Vanta Doesn’t Advertise

Questionnaire Limits That Scale Costs

Automated security-questionnaire responses are capped by tier. Plus commonly includes 25 per year, and Growth around 144. For a company actively closing enterprise deals, 25 responses evaporates fast. Once you hit the cap, you either upgrade a tier or buy additional questionnaire credits, both of which raise your effective annual cost beyond the headline quote.

Vendor Reviews and Add-On Upsells

Vendor risk reviews, additional user seats, and expanded asset coverage are frequent mid-contract upsells. The platform is engineered to surface gaps in your program, which is genuinely useful, but each surfaced gap tends to map to a module you can purchase to close it. Expect a steady drip of upgrade prompts as your program matures inside the tool.

 

Framework-Specific Vanta Pricing

SOC 2 Costs: Platform and Audit Combined

SOC 2 is the most common starting point. The Vanta platform for a single SOC 2 framework lands near $10,000 for a startup, and the separate Type 2 audit typically adds $8,000 to $50,000. Add a readiness assessment ($5,000 to $15,000) and penetration testing ($10,000 to $15,000), both frequently expected by enterprise buyers, and the realistic all-in first-year figure climbs well past the platform price alone. An internal audit ahead of the formal assessment can also surface gaps before they become findings, and is worth budgeting for separately.

ISO 27001 Pricing and Added Complexity

ISO 27001 carries more structural overhead than SOC 2 because certification involves a two-stage external audit and a three-year certification cycle with annual surveillance audits. The Vanta platform cost is broadly comparable to SOC 2, but the certification-body fees and recurring surveillance audits make the multi-year total higher. The standard itself is published by the International Organization for Standardization.

HIPAA Pricing Depending on Use Case

HIPAA is usually added as a secondary framework rather than bought alone, so its cost shows up as incremental framework pricing on top of an existing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 program. There is no single HIPAA certification audit in the way there is for SOC 2, which changes the cost shape: more of the spend goes to controls, documentation, and risk analysis than to a one-off attestation. The compliance obligations themselves are defined by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

 

Vanta Pricing vs. Top Competitors

Drata and Secureframe are Vanta’s most direct competitors. All three price on employee count and framework count, all three quote custom, and all three keep audit fees separate. The differences show up at the edges: starting price, pricing transparency, and where each platform invests its product development.

Vanta vs. Drata Pricing

Drata’s Foundation tier starts a little lower than Vanta’s Core, around $7,500 to $15,000 for one framework under 50 employees, but its average contract value runs higher than Vanta’s, reflecting a customer base that skews toward larger, multi-framework deals. Drata is frequently cited for class-leading multi-framework mapping and a strong auditor experience. The practical takeaway: similar list ranges, with Drata sometimes cheaper to start and pricier at scale.

Vanta vs. Secureframe Pricing

Secureframe is the transparency outlier, publishing a baseline starting price (around $7,500 to $12,000 for SOC 2) when the rest of the category hides everything behind a sales call. Its median contract matches Vanta’s at roughly $20,000, and it leans hardest into white-glove, managed implementation. For a team with no internal compliance bandwidth, that hands-on support is the differentiator more than the headline price.

The Bottom Line on Vanta’s Cost

Vanta costs most companies somewhere between $10,000 and $80,000 per year for the platform, with a median near $20,000, and the audit adds another $10,000 to $50,000 on top. The headline tier price is only the starting point: frameworks, questionnaire limits, add-on modules, and renewal uplifts all move the real number.

Treat the published-looking ranges as opening positions, separate the platform cost from the audit cost in every comparison, and use multi-year terms, framework bundling, quarter-end timing, and partner discounts to bring the total down. The platform is strong; the work is in making sure you pay for what you actually need.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Vanta cost per year?

Vanta starts at approximately $10,000 per year for the Core plan with one framework. Plus typically runs $15,000 to $30,000, Growth $25,000 to $50,000, Scale up to $80,000, and Enterprise above $80,000 with fully custom pricing. The median reported contract is around $20,000 per year.

No. The subscription covers the automation platform only. The SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit is performed by an independent firm and costs an additional $10,000 to $50,000 depending on framework, audit type, and company size.

Yes. Multi-year commitments, framework bundling, quarter-end timing, and certified-partner channels can all reduce the rate. Partner discounts of 20 to 40 percent on multi-year contracts are commonly reported.

Four main variables: employee headcount, number of frameworks, add-on modules selected (such as Trust Center or Vendor Risk Management), and contract length. Audit fees, readiness assessments, and penetration testing add further cost outside the subscription.

Cost rises with both headcount brackets and framework count, and complexity, more cloud accounts, vendors, and integrations, pushes you toward higher tiers and more add-ons. A company that doubles headcount and adds two frameworks can see its bill multiply significantly.

Vanta offers a large integration ecosystem covering cloud providers, identity systems, and developer tools. Standard integrations are generally included in the base subscription, while advanced provisioning (such as SCIM) and certain enterprise integrations appear only at higher tiers.

Axipro Author

Picture of Pedro Dias

Pedro Dias

Pedro has been writing online for over 10 years. With experience in all things programming, cyber security, and compliance, he is our editor-in-chief at Axipro.

Blog Highlights

Explore More Articles

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 Engagement

After a SOC 2 and ISO 27001 engagement, there are two documents out of the whole pile that actually close deals: the SOC 2 attestation report and the ISO 27001 certificate. Everything else your engagement produces exists to create those two, support them, or keep them alive for another year. Companies routinely ask their auditor for a SOC 2 certificate, which doesn’t exist. They send a prospect their full ISMS documentation when a one-page certificate would have done. They pay for six months of readiness work and then can’t say what they’re holding at the end of it. So here’s the full list. What a SOC 2 engagement produces, what an ISO 27001 engagement produces, what a combined program produces, and who gets to see each one. Understanding SOC 2 and ISO 27001 Engagement Outputs The Core Difference: Report vs. Certificate SOC 2 is an attestation. A licensed CPA firm examines your controls against the Trust Services Criteria under standards set by the AICPA, then writes up what it found and signs an opinion. No certificate. No logo from the AICPA. No pass or fail stamp. What you get is the report, and it usually runs 60 to 120 pages. ISO 27001 is a certification. An accredited certification body audits your Information Security Management System (ISMS) against ISO/IEC 27001:2022, and if you conform, it issues a certificate of registration. The certificate itself is a page or two. All the detail lives behind it, in your ISMS documentation and the audit reports the certification body writes as it goes. SOC 2 Engagement Deliverables The SOC 2 Attestation Report The report is the engagement. The AICPA’s illustrative SOC 2 report lays out the standard structure: auditor’s report, management’s assertion, system description, the Trust Services Criteria in scope, and the controls tested with their results. A Type I covers control design at one point in time. A Type II covers whether those controls actually operated over a period, usually three to twelve months, and most enterprise buyers now won’t accept anything else. Independent Auditor’s Opinion Letter First section of the report, and the first thing anyone experienced turns to. It gives the scope, the examination period, and the auditor’s conclusion. An unqualified opinion means the description held up and the controls worked. A qualified opinion means the auditor found something material, and every serious reviewer will want to talk about it. Management Assertion Your leadership signs a written statement stating that the system description is accurate and that the controls were properly designed and are operating. It reads like a formality, and it isn’t. The auditor’s entire examination runs against what management asserts here, so overstating anything creates real exposure. System Description Usually the longest part of the report, and you write it, not the auditor. It covers the services in scope, your infrastructure, software, people, processes, how data moves, which subservice organizations you depend on, and the complementary user entity controls your customers have to run on their side for your controls to hold up. Trust Services Criteria Applied Security (the Common Criteria) is in every SOC 2. Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy are optional, and the report names exactly which ones you picked. Whatever you decide during scoping ends up printed in a document your customers read for the next several years. Description of Tests of Controls and Results (Type II) The matrix: every control, what the auditor did to test it, and what came back, including exceptions. Reviewers spend most of their time here, because the exceptions tell them things the opinion letter won’t. Bridge Letter / Gap Letter Your report covers a fixed window, so one ending December 31 leaves a hole for a customer doing diligence in June. A bridge letter from your management, not the auditor, confirms that nothing material changed in the control environment between the report’s end date and today. You’ll write these often enough to keep a template. Management Letter and Observations Plenty of auditors also send an internal-only letter covering observations, minor exceptions, and suggestions that never reached the threshold of a qualified opinion. It’s the closest thing to free consulting you’ll get before next year’s audit starts. Insider Note: Ask early whether your auditor issues a management letter, and whether exceptions land in the report body or only in that letter. Firms handle this differently, and the answer decides what your customers see versus what stays behind your firewall. It rarely comes up in the proposal, but it changes how the finished report reads to a buyer. ISO 27001 Engagement Deliverables ISO 27001 Certificate of Registration The document everyone asks for. It names the certified legal entity, states the ISMS scope, identifies the certification body, carries an accreditation mark from a body recognized under the International Accreditation Forum such as UKAS or ANAB, and shows the validity dates. It’s good for three years as long as you pass annual surveillance audits. Read the scope statement carefully, on your own certificate as much as anyone else’s. A certificate covering one office or one product line says nothing about the rest of the business. Statement of Applicability (SoA) After the certificate, this is the document buyers request most. The Statement of Applicability runs through all 93 Annex A controls in ISO/IEC 27001:2022, says which apply to you, justifies the ones you excluded, and records where each stands. Auditors use it as the map of your control environment, and larger customers increasingly want to see it or a summary of it during diligence. Risk Assessment and Risk Treatment Plan Your methodology, the register it produced, and the Risk Treatment Plan showing what you decided to do about each significant risk: mitigate it with a control, transfer it, avoid it, or accept it. ISO 27001 is built around risk, so these documents are what justify every control decision recorded in the SoA. Information Security Management System (ISMS) Documentation The policy and procedure set, plus the operational records that prove any of it happens. Information

The EU AI Act’s transparency requirements take effect on 2 August 2026, and most of the companies they cover still think the rules are not their problem. Article 50 applies to any business that publishes AI-generated content or runs an AI system that talks to people in the EU. That includes the marketing team generating campaign images and the support team running a chatbot. It also covers the AI agents you’ve wired into customer email. Penalties reach €15 million or 3% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher, and you don’t need an office in Europe to be in scope. If your content or your chatbot reaches EU users, the obligations reach you. In a nutshell: if you publish AI-generated images or video, deploy chatbots or AI agents that interact with EU users, or publish AI-written text on matters of public interest, then yes, the EU AI Act applies, starting 2 August 2026. A quick word on the “AI Act delay” headlines. The Digital Omnibus package did push the high-risk system deadlines back, in some cases by more than a year, but it did not move the deployer obligations in Article 50. Companies that read those headlines and stood down their AI Act work made an expensive mistake, because the rules most likely to touch an ordinary business are the ones that stayed on the calendar. What Article 50 Actually Requires Article 50 of the AI Act sets out transparency obligations in four situations. In plain English: Tell people when they’re talking to AI. Systems designed to interact directly with people — chatbots, voice assistants, and AI agents — must make clear that the user is dealing with AI, unless that’s already obvious. Mark AI-generated content so machines can detect it. Providers of generative AI systems must mark outputs in a machine-readable format, typically through metadata and watermarking, so the content is detectable as artificially generated. Label deepfakes. Anyone deploying AI to generate or manipulate image, audio, or video content that resembles real people, places, objects, or events, and could falsely appear authentic, must disclose that the content is artificial. Label AI-generated text on matters of public interest. Text published to inform the public must carry a label if AI-generated or manipulated, unless a human reviewed it and a person or organization holds editorial responsibility for it. Article 50 also covers emotion recognition and biometric categorization systems, which carry their own disclosure duties. Far fewer businesses run into those, so this article sticks to the four above. The distinction running through all of this is provider vs deployer. The provider builds or supplies the AI system. The deployer uses it professionally. Most companies reading this are deployers. If You Use AI-Generated Images Realistic AI images sit closer to the deepfake rules than most marketing teams assume. The Act’s definition covers content depicting people, objects, places, and events that could falsely appear authentic to a viewer, which describes a large share of what image generators produce for campaigns, social posts, and landing pages. So what does “clearly and distinguishably labeled” mean? The threshold is best described by its failures: a tiny disclosure hidden in the website footer doesn’t qualify. Neither does a faint label on an image, a label that flashes for an instant in a video, or a disclosure buried in your terms and conditions. The label has to be visible right where someone sees the content, and it has to meet accessibility standards so people with disabilities can perceive it too. The Code of Practice proposes a standardized “AI” visual label, localized per language (“KI” in German, “IA” in French). It also draws a useful line between fully AI-generated content and AI-assisted content, with lighter requirements for the latter. A designer who used AI to extend a background is in a different position from a team publishing a fully synthetic image of a person who doesn’t exist. Important: The deepfake duty doesn’t care about intent. A flattering, harmless AI image of your CEO at an event that never happened is still a deepfake under the Act. Marketing teams generate this kind of content casually. From August, every one of those images needs a label. If You Deploy AI Agents or Chatbots The rule itself is simple: people must know they’re dealing with AI. The provider carries the design obligation, but as the deployer you’re the one putting the system in front of your customers, and you’re the one an EU regulator will contact if your branded assistant pretends to be human. The Act contains an exception for cases where it’s “obvious” the user is talking to AI, judged from the perspective of a reasonably well-informed and observant person. Don’t lean on it. What’s obvious to your product team isn’t obvious to every customer, and the human-sounding voice agents and email-writing AI agents rolling out right now are designed specifically to not feel like software. If an AI agent negotiates a renewal over email or handles a support ticket end to end, disclose it. Pro Tip: Put the Disclosure at the Start of the Interaction Put the disclosure at the start of the interaction, in the interface itself: “You’re chatting with an AI assistant.” A line in your privacy policy doesn’t meet the standard, and a disclosure that appears after the conversation ends is worthless. For voice agents, say it up front in the greeting. What Your AI Vendors Owe You The machine-readable marking obligation in Article 50(2) sits with providers — the companies supplying your generative AI tools. The final Code of Practice expects providers to apply at least two layers of marking where necessary, such as embedded metadata combined with watermarking, and to offer detection mechanisms so deployers, authorities, and researchers can verify whether a piece of content came from AI. One timing caveat: the Digital Omnibus gives generative AI systems already on the market before 2 August 2026 until 2 December 2026 to comply with the marking requirement. Every other Article 50 obligation stays on

How Axipro Guided Technovative Solutions & DigiProd Pass to ISO 27001